Derecho de la OMC
– BAO, LINGGUANG: âThe WTO accession and tax policy options in Chinaâ, Intertax, vol. 29, nÂș 8/9, 2001, p. 288-289.
– Carreau, Dominique, Flory, ThiĂ©baut y Juillard, Patrick:
–Â Droit International Economique, 3ÂȘ ed., LGDJ, Paris, 1990.
–Â Droit International, Pedone, Paris, 3ÂȘ ediciĂłn, 1991.
– Castillo de la Torre, F.: «The status of GATT in EEC Law. Some new developements», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 26, nÂș 5, 1992, p. 35 y ss.
– Click, Leslie Alan:Â Multilateral trade negotiations. World trade after the Tokyo Round, Rowand and Allanheld, Publishers, NJ, 1984.
– DĂaz Mier, M. A., MarĂa Ăvila, A., Castillo Urrutia, J. A.:Â RegulaciĂłn del comercio internacional tras la Ronda Uruguay, Tecnos, 1994.
– DĂaz Mier, M. A.:Â Del GATT a la OrganizaciĂłn Mundial de Comercio, SĂntesis, 1996.
– Flory, T.: Le GATT:Â Droit International et Commerce Mondial, LGDJ, ParĂs, 1968.
– Foster, David: «The MTN Codes in the GATT Ministerial», Managing Trade relations in the 1980`s, editado por Seymour J. Rubin y Thomas R. Graham, Rowan and Allanheld Publishers, NJ, 1984, p. 50 y ss.
– Garre Alcaraz, Felipe: «La problemĂĄtica aduanera en otros organismos internacionales», HPE, 1977-2, nÂș 49, p. 221.
– GATT:
– Basic Instruments and Selected Documents, Ginebra, varios años.
–Â The Tokyo Round MTN, Report by the Director General, Ginebra, abril 1979.
– Graham, Thomas R.: «Reforming the international trading system: the Tokyo Round trade negotiations in the final stage», Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 12, 1979, p. 1 y ss.
– Ibåñez Marsilla, S.: «La competencia fiscal perniciosa ante la OMC. Reflexiones al hilo del asunto de las Foreign Sales Corporations», CrĂłnica Tributaria, nÂș 113, 2004, p. 65-106.
– Jackson, J.H.:
– «The puzzle of GATT: Legal aspects of a surprising institution», Journal of World Trade Law, marzo-abril 1967, vol. I y II.
–Â World Trade and the Law of GATT. A legal analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Bobbs-Merril Company, IndianĂĄpolis, 1969.
– «The birth of the GATT-MTN system: a constitutional appraisal», Law and Policy in international Business, vol. 12, 1980, p. 21.
–Â The world trading system. Law and policy of international relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.
–Â The jurisprudence of GATT & the WTO, Cambridge University Press, 2000
– KRAJEWSKI, MARKUS: âDemocratic legitimacy and constitutional perspectives of WTO Lawâ, Journal of World Trade, vol. 35, 2001, nÂș 1, p. 167-186.
– Li, Kuo-Lee: «The law of GATT: study and research», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 18, 1984, p. 357 y ss.
– Liebman, Howard M.: «GATT and countertrade requirements», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 18, 1984, p. 2522 y ss.
– LUJA, RAYMOND H.C.:
– âWTO agreements versus the EC fiscal aid regime: impact on direct taxationâ, Intertax, vol. 27, nÂș 6/7, 1999, p. 207-225
– âAnti-tax-avoidance rules and fiscal trade incentivesâ, Intertax, vol. 28, nÂș 6/7, 2000, p. 226-24.
– Macdonald, Donald S.: «The multilateral trade negotiations- a lawyerÂŽs perspective», Canadian Business Law Journal, vol. 4, 1979-80, p. 139 y ss.
– MCDANIEL, PAUL R.: âThe impact of trade agreements on tax systemsâ, Intertax, vol. 30, nÂș 5, 2002
– Montañå-Mora: «A GATT with teeth. Law wins over politics in the resolution of international trade disputes», Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 31, 1993.
– PEARSON, GAIL: âBusiness incentives and the GATT Subsidies Agreementâ, Australian Business Law Review, nÂș 23, 1995, p. 368-396
– Petersmann, E.U. (ed):Â The European Community and the GATT, con Hilf y Jacobs (eds.), Kuwer, Deventer, 1986.
– PETERSMAN, ERNST-ULRICH:
–Â The GATT-WTO dispute settlement system, Kluwer, Londres, 1998
– âHuman rights and the law of the WTOâ, Journal of World Trade, vol. 37, nÂș 2, 2003, p. 241-281.
– Raworth, Philip:Â Law and practice of the WTO, Oceana Publications, obra actualizable.
– REAGAN, DONALD H.:
– âRegulatory purpose and `like productsÂŽ in Article III:4 of the GATT (with additional remarks on Article III:2)â, Journal of World Trade, vol. 36, nÂș 3, 2002, p. 443-478.
– âFurther thoughts on the role of regulatory purpose under Article III of the GATTâ, Journal of World Trade, vol. 37, nÂș 4, 2003, p. 737-760.
– Roessler, Frieder: «Countertrade and the GATT legal system», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 19, 1985, p. 604 y ss.
– SLOTBOOM, MARCO M.: âSubsidies in WTO Law and in EC Law. Broad and narrow definitionsâ, Journal of World Trade, vol. 36, nÂș 3, 2002, p. 517-542.
– SORENSEN, KARSTEN E.: âDirect taxation and the WTO agreementsâ, European Taxation, junio/Julio 2002, p. 206-213
– Steenbergen, J.: «The status of GATT in Community Law», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 15, nÂș 4, 1981, p. 337 y ss.
– Twiggs, Joan E.:Â The Tokyo Round of MTN. A case study in building domestic support for diplomacy, University Pres of America, 1987.
– US Department of Commerce:Â The Tokyo Round Trade Agreements, US International Trade Administration, Washington DC, 1980.
– Verdun, Vincene: «Are governmentally imposed countertrade requirements violations of the GATT?», Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 11, 1985, p. 191 y ss.