Derecho de la OMC

Publicado el 31 de marzo, 2021

– BAO, LINGGUANG: “The WTO accession and tax policy options in China”, Intertax, vol. 29, nÂș 8/9, 2001, p. 288-289.

– Carreau, Dominique, Flory, ThiĂ©baut y Juillard, Patrick:

– Droit International Economique, 3ÂȘ ed., LGDJ, Paris, 1990.
– Droit International, Pedone, Paris, 3ÂȘ ediciĂłn, 1991.

– Castillo de la Torre, F.: «The status of GATT in EEC Law. Some new developements», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 26, nÂș 5, 1992, p. 35 y ss.

– Click, Leslie Alan: Multilateral trade negotiations. World trade after the Tokyo Round, Rowand and Allanheld, Publishers, NJ, 1984.

– DĂ­az Mier, M. A., MarĂ­a Ávila, A., Castillo Urrutia, J. A.: RegulaciĂłn del comercio internacional tras la Ronda Uruguay, Tecnos, 1994.

– DĂ­az Mier, M. A.: Del GATT a la OrganizaciĂłn Mundial de Comercio, SĂ­ntesis, 1996.

– Flory, T.: Le GATT: Droit International et Commerce Mondial, LGDJ, ParĂ­s, 1968.

– Foster, David: «The MTN Codes in the GATT Ministerial», Managing Trade relations in the 1980`s, editado por Seymour J. Rubin y Thomas R. Graham, Rowan and Allanheld Publishers, NJ, 1984, p. 50 y ss.

– Garre Alcaraz, Felipe: «La problemĂĄtica aduanera en otros organismos internacionales», HPE, 1977-2, nÂș 49, p. 221.

– GATT:

– Basic Instruments and Selected Documents, Ginebra, varios años.
– The Tokyo Round MTN, Report by the Director General, Ginebra, abril 1979.

– Graham, Thomas R.: «Reforming the international trading system: the Tokyo Round trade negotiations in the final stage», Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 12, 1979, p. 1 y ss.

– Ibåñez Marsilla, S.: «La competencia fiscal perniciosa ante la OMC. Reflexiones al hilo del asunto de las Foreign Sales Corporations», CrĂłnica Tributaria, nÂș 113, 2004, p. 65-106.

– Jackson, J.H.:

– «The puzzle of GATT: Legal aspects of a surprising institution», Journal of World Trade Law, marzo-abril 1967, vol. I y II.
– World Trade and the Law of GATT. A legal analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Bobbs-Merril Company, IndianĂĄpolis, 1969.
– «The birth of the GATT-MTN system: a constitutional appraisal», Law and Policy in international Business, vol. 12, 1980, p. 21.
– The world trading system. Law and policy of international relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.
– The jurisprudence of GATT & the WTO, Cambridge University Press, 2000

– KRAJEWSKI, MARKUS: “Democratic legitimacy and constitutional perspectives of WTO Law”, Journal of World Trade, vol. 35, 2001, nÂș 1, p. 167-186.

– Li, Kuo-Lee: «The law of GATT: study and research», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 18, 1984, p. 357 y ss.

– Liebman, Howard M.: «GATT and countertrade requirements», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 18, 1984, p. 2522 y ss.

– LUJA, RAYMOND H.C.:

– “WTO agreements versus the EC fiscal aid regime: impact on direct taxation”, Intertax, vol. 27, nÂș 6/7, 1999, p. 207-225
– “Anti-tax-avoidance rules and fiscal trade incentives”, Intertax, vol. 28, nÂș 6/7, 2000, p. 226-24.

– Macdonald, Donald S.: «The multilateral trade negotiations- a lawyerÂŽs perspective», Canadian Business Law Journal, vol. 4, 1979-80, p. 139 y ss.

– MCDANIEL, PAUL R.: “The impact of trade agreements on tax systems”, Intertax, vol. 30, nÂș 5, 2002

– Montañå-Mora: «A GATT with teeth. Law wins over politics in the resolution of international trade disputes», Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 31, 1993.

– PEARSON, GAIL: “Business incentives and the GATT Subsidies Agreement”, Australian Business Law Review, nÂș 23, 1995, p. 368-396

– Petersmann, E.U. (ed): The European Community and the GATT, con Hilf y Jacobs (eds.), Kuwer, Deventer, 1986.

– PETERSMAN, ERNST-ULRICH:

– The GATT-WTO dispute settlement system, Kluwer, Londres, 1998
– “Human rights and the law of the WTO”, Journal of World Trade, vol. 37, nÂș 2, 2003, p. 241-281.

– Raworth, Philip: Law and practice of the WTO, Oceana Publications, obra actualizable.

– REAGAN, DONALD H.:

– “Regulatory purpose and `like productsÂŽ in Article III:4 of the GATT (with additional remarks on Article III:2)”, Journal of World Trade, vol. 36, nÂș 3, 2002, p. 443-478.
– “Further thoughts on the role of regulatory purpose under Article III of the GATT”, Journal of World Trade, vol. 37, nÂș 4, 2003, p. 737-760.

– Roessler, Frieder: «Countertrade and the GATT legal system», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 19, 1985, p. 604 y ss.

– SLOTBOOM, MARCO M.: “Subsidies in WTO Law and in EC Law. Broad and narrow definitions”, Journal of World Trade, vol. 36, nÂș 3, 2002, p. 517-542.

– SORENSEN, KARSTEN E.: “Direct taxation and the WTO agreements”, European Taxation, junio/Julio 2002, p. 206-213

– Steenbergen, J.: «The status of GATT in Community Law», Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 15, nÂș 4, 1981, p. 337 y ss.

– Twiggs, Joan E.: The Tokyo Round of MTN. A case study in building domestic support for diplomacy, University Pres of America, 1987.

– US Department of Commerce: The Tokyo Round Trade Agreements, US International Trade Administration, Washington DC, 1980.

– Verdun, Vincene: «Are governmentally imposed countertrade requirements violations of the GATT?», Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 11, 1985, p. 191 y ss.